This site stores cookies. None of them are intended to be harmful to you, they mainly are intended to make navigation easier. We also use Clicky Analytics here to gain understanding of what users are seeing and taking an interest in. If you don't like the idea of cookies and analytics, don't carry on. Leave now. Simple really.

If you navigate this site - we consider that you have given your IMPLIED CONSENT.

If you'd like to see a list of the cookies that NING sites use click here


I will soon cancel this site in the face of the legistation that came into play on 25 May 2018.

It isn't worth the hassle of getting this site definitively compliant to be frank - so I'll move the content to another site which is already GDPR compliant from the outset.

I'll move the blogs, photos, forum items in due course and meantime I will delete all the membership entries from the site so that no personal data is being held.

Long live Privacy and Security, eh? :-)

Current Status

We've killed off the registration part of the site AND parked for purging all previously held registration data because GDPR makes it un-economic to keep that.

The Mandelson Factor.

Article from Express Sunday 9th August 09

I start by stating my appreciation of the fact that we have people of his calibre in public life. He’s a real player and I think that he’s in general terms a force for good governance. I rate him highly.

Many people have negative views of him personally, though in most cases I think they’re reacting to the persona created by some parts of the press. They’re the same people who would think that Machiavelli was always a force for evil, which he wasn’t.

Mandelson saved Browns neck this week in the estimation of many people and I agree with that view of the situation. If it weren’t for Lord Peter I think we’d be in general election mode within a few days.

Now to my question:

How valid is it for him or any other unelected person to be acting in a position of governance? I’ve already said I rate him highly, but there are many others that I rate equally highly and if he wasn’t elected, why should we not have an executive arm of the state that simply employs the best people for the job and sticks them all in high office via the House of Lords?

In fact, why do we need an elected government at all on that basis? Why doesn’t QE2 just go and get the best squad she can and let them run UK PLC?

The answer is of course DEMOCRACY, which I think the current goverment has done much to undermine (take the referendum matter as an instance) and which it doesn’t apparently care too much about.

If Peter Mandelson and Digby Jones and Alan Sugar are going to be asked to run the country, doesn’t it say so much about the quality of the ELECTED people that are available to this government?

To be continued …

Views: 44

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of to add comments!


About.Me is a nice facility ...

All your links in one place - simple but really nicely done AND including some analytics. Come and have a look at my links?

© 2020   Created by Mike Briercliffe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Web Statistics